Anglo American Strategic Relations And The Far East 1933 1939

This volume charts how the national strategic needs of the United States of America and Great Britain created a "parallel but not joint" relationship towards the Far East as the crisis in that region evolved from 1933-39. In short, it is a look at the relationship shared between the two nations with respect to accommodating one another on certain strategic and diplomatic issues so that they could become more confident of one another in any potential showdowns with Japan.

The documents also reveal the way the concept of the 'special relationship' was used as a 'tool of diplomacy' on both sides of the Atlantic.

This new collection of essays, from leading British and Canadian scholars, presents an excellent insight into the strategic thinking of the British Empire. It defines the main areas of the strategic decision-making process that was known as 'Imperial Defence'. The theme is one of imperial defence and defence of empire, so chapters will be historiographical in nature, discussing the major features of each key component of imperial defence, areas of agreement and disagreement in the existing literature on critical interpretations, introducing key individuals and positions and commenting on the appropriateness of existing studies, as well as identifying a raft of new directions for future research.

Britain's strategic position east of Suez in the twentieth century was a dominant area of interest and had an enormous impact in the overall construction of Great Britain's naval strategic posture.

History of International Relations, Diplomacy and Intelligence, 13 (History of International Relations Library, 13) For the first four decades of the twentieth century Philip Kerr, the Eleventh Marquess of Lothian, hovered on the fringes of power in Britain. As a commentator on public affairs, private secretary to Liberal prime minister David Lloyd George, secretary to the Rhodes Trust, Liberal peer, and ambassador to the United States at the beginning of World War II, Lothian's greatest interest was in preserving and strengthening the British Empire and building close bonds with the United States. This international collection of essays by seven scholars explores Lothian's impact on Anglo-American relations and his role, behind the scenes and as a government official, in forging what would eventually become known as the "special relationship." Table of Contents PREFACE INTRODUCTION The Making of an Atlanticist: Philip Kerr, 1882-1921 Priscilla Roberts CHAPTER ONE Lord Lothian, Russia, and Ideas for a New International Order, 1916-1922 Keith Neilson CHAPTER TWO Philip Kerr, the Irish Question, and Anglo-American Relations, 1916-1921 Melanie Sayers CHAPTER THREE The Interwar Philip Lothian Priscilla Roberts CHAPTER FOUR Lord Lothian, the Far East, and Anglo-American Strategic Relations, 1934-1941 Greg Kennedy CHAPTER FIVE Lord Lothian's Ambassadorship in Washington August 1939-December 1940 J. Simon Rofe CHAPTER SIX Creating a Sense of Criticality: 'Lothian's Method' and the Evolution of U.S. Wartime Aid to Britain Gavin Bailey CHAPTER SEVEN Lothian and the Problem of Relative Decline David P. Billington, Jr. CONCLUSION The Final Stage Priscilla Roberts BIBLIOGRAPHY INFORMATION ON CONTRIBUTORS INDEX About the Author(s)/Editor(s) Priscilla Roberts, Ph.D. (1981) in History, King's College, Cambridge, is Associate Professor of History at the University of Hong Kong. She has published extensively on twentieth-century international history and Anglo-American diplomacy. David P. Billington, Jr., Ph.D. (1995) in History, University of Texas at Austin. is an independent scholar. His books include Lothian: Philip Kerr and the Quest for World Order (2006). Greg Kennedy, Ph.D. (1998) in History, University of Albera, is Professor of Strategic Foreign Policy at the Defence Studies Department, King's College, London. He has written extensively on strategic foreign policy issues, diplomacy, and intelligence, including Anglo-American Strategic Relations and the Far East, 1933-1939 (2002). Keith Neilson is a professor in the History Department of the Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. He has written extensively on British strategic foreign policy, particularly with regard to Russia and the Soviet Union. Gavin Bailey is a research student at Dundee University, completing a Ph.D. thesis on Anglo-American aviation supply collaboration during the Second World War. He has a particular interest in locating technically-informed military history within the broader context of diplomatic and economic statecraft. J. Simon Rofe is a lecturer in the Centre for American Studies in the Department of Politics & International Relations, University of Leicester. His research interests focus on twentieth-century U.S. foreign relations and diplomacy. Amongst his most recent publications is Franklin Roosevelt's Foreign Policy and the Welles Mission (2007). Melanie Sayers is finishing her Ph.D.thesis at the University of Edinburgh. This will explore the involvement of Philip Kerr in the Irish problem, particularly between the years 1916-1921, and his influence on the settlement finally reached.

On December 12, 1937, Japanese aircraft sank the American gunboat Panay, which was anchored in the Yangtze River outside Nanjing, China. Although the Japanese apologized, the attack turned American public opinion against Japan, and President Roosevelt dispatched Captain Royal Ingersoll to London to begin conversations with the British admiralty about Japanese aggression in the Far East. While few Americans remember the Panay Incident, it established the first links in the chain of Anglo-American military collaboration that eventually triumphed in World War II. In The Origins of the Grand Alliance, William T. Johnsen provides the first comprehensive analysis of military collaboration between the United States and Great Britain before the Second World War. He sets the stage by examining Anglo-French and Anglo-American coalition military planning from 1900 through World War I and the interwar years. Johnsen also considers the formulation of policy and grand strategy, operational planning, and the creation of the command structure and channels of communication. He addresses vitally important logistical and materiel issues, particularly the difficulties of war production. Military conflicts in the early twenty-first century continue to underscore the increasing importance of coalition warfare for historian and soldier alike. Drawn from extensive sources and private papers held in the United Kingdom, Canada, and the United States, Johnsen's exhaustively researched study refutes the idea that America was the naive junior partner in the coalition and casts new light on the US-UK "special relationship."

'Influence' is a slippery concept, yet one of tremendous relevance for those wishing to understand global politics. From debates on the changing sources of power in the international system, through to analyses of its value as an alternative to the active use of force as a policy instrument, influence has become a recurrent theme in discussions of international relations and foreign policy. In order to provide a better understanding of the multifaceted and shifting nature of influence, this volume looks at how the British government employed various forms of pressure and persuasion to achieve its goals across the twentieth century. By focusing on Britain - a global actor with great power objectives but declining physical means - the collection provides a wide range of case studies to assess how influence was brought to bear on a wide array of non-western cultures and societies. It furthermore allows for an assessment of just how effective - or ineffective - British efforts were at influencing non-Western targets over a hundred years of operations. By shedding important light on the efficacy of British efforts to sustain and advance its interests in the twentieth century, the volume will be of interest not only to historians, but to anyone interested in contemporary problems surrounding the operation of influence as a foreign policy tool.