Argumentation
Download Argumentation full books in PDF, epub, and Kindle. Read online free Argumentation ebook anywhere anytime directly on your device. Fast Download speed and no annoying ads. We cannot guarantee that every ebooks is available!
The Practice of Argumentation
Author | : David Zarefsky |
Publsiher | : Cambridge University Press |
Total Pages | : 287 |
Release | : 2019-09-19 |
Genre | : Philosophy |
ISBN | : 9781107034716 |
Download The Practice of Argumentation Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
Explores how we justify our beliefs - and try to influence those of others - both soundly and effectively.
Visualizing Argumentation
Author | : Paul A. Kirschner,Simon J. Buckingham Shum,Chad S. Carr |
Publsiher | : Springer Science & Business Media |
Total Pages | : 234 |
Release | : 2012-12-06 |
Genre | : Computers |
ISBN | : 9781447100379 |
Download Visualizing Argumentation Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
This text examines the use of collaboration technologies in the problem-solving or decision-making process. These systems are widely used in both education and in the workplace to enable virtual groups to discuss and exchange ideas on issues ranging from applied problems to theoretical debate. While some systems are text-based, the majority rely on visualization techniques to allow participants to represent their ideas in a more flexible, graphical form. The text evaluates existing systems, and looks at how the specific needs of users in both educational and corporate environments can be reflected in the design of new systems.
Mathematical Argumentation in Middle School The What Why and How
Author | : Jennifer Knudsen,Harriette S. Stevens,Teresa Lara-Meloy,Hee-Joon Kim,Nikki Schechtman,Nicole Shechtman |
Publsiher | : Corwin Press |
Total Pages | : 185 |
Release | : 2017-09-21 |
Genre | : Education |
ISBN | : 9781506394237 |
Download Mathematical Argumentation in Middle School The What Why and How Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
This research-based book brings tough Standards for Mathematical Practice 3 standards for mathematical argumentation and critical reasoning alive - all within a thoroughly explained four-part model that covers generating cases, conjecturing, justifying, and concluding.
Inference in Argumentation
Author | : Eddo Rigotti,Sara Greco |
Publsiher | : Springer |
Total Pages | : 325 |
Release | : 2018-12-10 |
Genre | : Language Arts & Disciplines |
ISBN | : 9783030045685 |
Download Inference in Argumentation Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
This book investigates the role of inference in argumentation, considering how arguments support standpoints on the basis of different loci. The authors propose and illustrate a model for the analysis of the standpoint-argument connection, called Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT). A prominent feature of the AMT is that it distinguishes, within each and every single argumentation, between an inferential-procedural component, on which the reasoning process is based; and a material-contextual component, which anchors the argument in the interlocutors’ cultural and factual common ground. The AMT explains how these components differ and how they are intertwined within each single argument. This model is introduced in Part II of the book, following a careful reconstruction of the enormously rich tradition of studies on inference in argumentation, from the antiquity to contemporary authors, without neglecting medieval and post-medieval contributions. The AMT is a contemporary model grounded in a dialogue with such tradition, whose crucial aspects are illuminated in this book.
Relevance in Argumentation
Author | : Douglas Walton |
Publsiher | : Routledge |
Total Pages | : 325 |
Release | : 2003-10-17 |
Genre | : Language Arts & Disciplines |
ISBN | : 9781135618957 |
Download Relevance in Argumentation Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
In Relevance in Argumentation, author Douglas Walton presents a new method for critically evaluating arguments for relevance. This method enables a critic to judge whether a move can be said to be relevant or irrelevant, and is based on case studies of argumentation in which an argument, or part of an argument, has been criticized as irrelevant. Walton's method is based on a new theory of relevance that incorporates techniques of argumentation theory, logic, and artificial intelligence. The work uses a case-study approach with numerous examples of controversial arguments, strategies of attack in argumentation, and fallacies. Walton reviews ordinary cases of irrelevance in argumentation, and uses them as a basis to advance and develop his new theory of irrelevance and relevance. The volume also presents a clear account of the technical problems in the previous attempts to define relevance, including an analysis of formal systems of relevance logic and an explanation of the Grecian notion of conversational relevance. This volume is intended for graduate and advanced undergraduate courses in those fields using argumentation theory--especially philosophy, linguistics, cognitive science and communication studies, in addition to argumentation. The work also has practical use, as it applies theory directly to familiar examples of argumentation in daily and professional life. With a clear and comprehensive method for determining relevance and irrelevance, it can be convincingly applied to highly significant practical problems about relevance, including those in legal and political argumentation.
The Language of Argumentation
Author | : Ronny Boogaart,Henrike Jansen,Maarten van Leeuwen |
Publsiher | : Springer Nature |
Total Pages | : 326 |
Release | : 2021-01-20 |
Genre | : Philosophy |
ISBN | : 9783030529079 |
Download The Language of Argumentation Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
Bringing together scholars from a broad range of theoretical perspectives, The Language of Argumentation offers a unique overview of research at the crossroads of linguistics and theories of argumentation. In addition to theoretical and methodological reflections by leading scholars in their fields, the book contains studies of the relationship between language and argumentation from two different viewpoints. While some chapters take a specific argumentative move as their point of departure and investigate the ways in which it is linguistically manifested in discourse, other chapters start off from a linguistic construction, trying to determine its argumentative function and rhetorical potential. The Language of Argumentation documents the currently prominent research on stylistic aspects of argumentation and illustrates how the study of argumentation benefits from insights from linguistic models, ranging from theoretical pragmatics, politeness theory and metaphor studies to models of discourse coherence and construction grammar.
Elements of Argumentation
Author | : Philippe Besnard,Anthony Hunter |
Publsiher | : Unknown |
Total Pages | : 320 |
Release | : 2008 |
Genre | : Computers |
ISBN | : UOM:39015079215045 |
Download Elements of Argumentation Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
Background and techniques for formalizing deductive argumentation in a logic-based framework for artificial intelligence.
Argumentation between Doctors and Patients
Author | : Frans H. van Eemeren,Bart Garssen,Nanon Labrie |
Publsiher | : John Benjamins Publishing Company |
Total Pages | : 167 |
Release | : 2021-02-15 |
Genre | : Language Arts & Disciplines |
ISBN | : 9789027260109 |
Download Argumentation between Doctors and Patients Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
Argumentation between Doctors and Patients discusses the use of argumentation in clinical settings. Starting from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, it aims at providing an understanding of argumentative discourse in the context of doctor-patient interaction. It explains when and how interactions between doctors and patients can be reconstructed as argumentative, what it means for doctors and patients to reasonably resolve a difference of opinion, what it implies to strive simultaneously for reasonableness and effectiveness in clinical discourse, and when such efforts derail into fallaciousness. Argumentation between Doctors and Patients is of interest to all those who seek to improve their understanding of argumentation in a medical context – whether they are students, scholars of argumentation, or medical practitioners. Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Nanon Labrie are prominent argumentation theorists. In writing Argumentation between Doctors and Patients, they have benefited from the advice of an Advisory Board consisting of both medical practitioners and argumentation scholars.