Globalization And Armed Conflict

Shows that expanding commercial ties between states pacifies some, but not necessarily all, political relationships.

This fascinating collected volume explores the relationship between world conflict, political unrest and the driving forces of Capitalism and Globalization.

Predictions that globalization would undermine territorial attachments and weaken the sources of territorial conflict have not been realized in recent decades. Globalization may have produced changes in territoriality and the functions of borders, but it has not eliminated them. The contributors to this volume examine this relationship, arguing that much of the change can be attributed to sources other than economic globalization. Bringing the perspectives of law, political science, anthropology, and geography to bear on the complex causal relations among territoriality, conflict, and globalization, leading contributors examine how territorial attachments are constructed, why they have remained so powerful in the face of an increasingly globalized world, and what effect continuing strong attachments may have on conflict. They argue that territorial attachments and people's willingness to fight for territory depends upon the symbolic role it plays in constituting people's identities, and producing a sense of belonging in an increasingly globalized world.

This book explores the integrated security approach in general, and more in particular in relation to states after regime-change and post-conflict states. The integrated security approach is analyzed from various perspectives and starting from various scientific disciplines. On the one hand this raises highly specific questions like: what is CIMIC (civil-military cooperation) and how does it function in practice? On the other hand the book has broader ambitions and tries to see the current debate on regime change in dictatorial or fundamental regimes and the process of reconstruction afterwards against the background of a wider discussion on globalization and the war against terrorism. Contributors include: Rob de Wijk, Ko Colijn, Georg Frerks, Afshin Ellian, Gerd Junne, Mient Jan Faber & Martijn Dekker, Mark Heirman, Isabelle Duyvesteyn, Christa Meindersma, Bas Rietjens & Robert Beeres & Myriame Bollen, Diederik de Boer & Stella Pfisterer, Koos van der Bruggen, Eva Nieuwenhuys and Gelijn Molier. CONTENTS Preface Acknowledgments Note on the contributors Abbreviations 1. The challenges of peace, security and development in an era of globalisation and changing concepts of war and terrorism G. Molier and E.C. Nieuwenhuys Part I - Theoretical reflections on the causes of war and on future concepts of peace, security and development 2. How civilizations can bridge cultural and religious differences M. Heirman 3. Integrating development studies in peace and security studies G. Junne 4. Development aid by tank viewed in the light of the globalisation of the Western development model E.C. Nieuwenhuys Part II - Reflections on the prevention, the legitimacy, and the settlement of armed conflicts 5. The Effectiveness of Intervention Instruments in Armed Conflict; Conflict Resolution is the Only Solution? I. Duyvestyn 6. Fighting Terrorism: a Useful Military Strategy? R. de Wijk 7. Winning the hearts and minds of the foreign protectors M. Dekker and M.J. Faber Part III - Reflections on reconstruction during and after armed conflict 8. A Comprehensive Approach to State Building C. Meindersma 9. Civil-military cooperation: a balancing act under precarious conditions G. Frerks 10. The Civil-Military Network in Baghlan Province: A Viable System? S.J.H. Rietjens, R. Beeres and M.T.I.B. Bollen 11. "The Missing Link in State-building. Bilateral Donor and Donor-NGO Policies on Linking state-society building in fragile states." D. de Boer en S. Pfisterer 12. Political transition to a democratic regime: The South African echoes of forgiveness, truth commission and Negotiating Justice A.Ellian Part IV - New concepts of peace, security and development from a legal, ethical and political perspective 13. Rebuilding after armed conflict: towards a legal framework of the responsibility to rebuild or a ius post bellum? G. Molier 14. Other wars? Other norms? K. van der Bruggen 15. On more than Just War Ko Colijn Index

This book provides the first comprehensive analysis of factors that transform a prima facie non-international armed conflict (NIAC) into an international armed conflict (IAC) and the consequences that follow from this process of internationalization. It examines in detail the historical development as well as the current state of the relevant rules of international humanitarian law. The discussion is grounded in general international law, complemented with abundant references to case law, and illustrated by examples from twentieth and twenty-first century armed conflicts. In Part I, the book puts forward a thorough catalogue of modalities of conflict internationalization that includes outside intervention, State dissolution, and recognition of belligerency. It then specifically considers the legal qualification of complex situations that feature more than two conflict parties and contrasts the mechanism of internationalization of armed conflicts with the reverse process of de-internationalization. Part II of the book challenges the conventional wisdom that members of non-State armed groups do not normally benefit from combatant status. It argues that the majority of fighters belonging to non-State armed groups in most types of internationalized armed conflicts are in fact eligible for combatant status. Finally, Part III turns to belligerent occupation, traditionally understood as a leading example of a notion that cannot be transposed to armed conflicts occurring in the territory of a single State. By contrast, the book argues in favour of the applicability of the law of belligerent occupation to internationalized armed conflicts.

Focusing on the political economy of so-called new wars, this book presents a series of studies that analyse the complexities of current warfare by moving from the global sphere to local spots of organised violence. It thus raises questions about the very idea of intra-state wars and shows that these wars are inseparably linked to the global econom

This book is a critical exploration of the war on terror from the prism of armed drones and globalization. It is particularly focused on the United States’ use of the drones, and the systemic dysfunctions that globalization has caused to international political economy and national security, creating backlash in which the desirability of globalization is not only increasingly questioned, but the resultant dissension about its desirability appears increasingly militating against the international consensus needed to fight the war on terror. To underline the controversial nature of the war on terror and the pragmatic weapon (armed drones) fashioned for its prosecution, some of the elements of this controversy have been interrogated in this book. They include, amongst others, the doubt over whether the war should have been declared in the first place because terrorist attacks hardly meet the United Nations’ casus belli – an armed attack. There are critics, as highlighted in this book, who believe that the war on terror is not an armed conflict properly so called, and, thus, remains only a law enforcement issue. The United States and all the states taking part in the war on terror are obligated to observe International Humanitarian Law (IHL). It is within this context of IHL that this book appraises the drone as a weapon of engagement, discussing such issues as personality and signature strikes as well as the implications of the deployment of spies as drone strikers rather than the Defence Department, the members of the U.S armed forces. This book will be of value to researchers, academics, policymakers, professionals, and students in the fields of security studies, terrorism, the law of armed conflict, international humanitarian law, and international politics.