Judicial Review In An Objective Legal System
Download Judicial Review In An Objective Legal System full books in PDF, epub, and Kindle. Read online free Judicial Review In An Objective Legal System ebook anywhere anytime directly on your device. Fast Download speed and no annoying ads. We cannot guarantee that every ebooks is available!
Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System
Author | : Tara Smith |
Publsiher | : Cambridge University Press |
Total Pages | : 303 |
Release | : 2015-07-30 |
Genre | : Law |
ISBN | : 9781107114494 |
Download Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
This book grounds judicial review in its deepest foundations: the function, authority, and objectivity of a legal system as a whole.
Limiting Rights
Author | : Janet Hiebert |
Publsiher | : McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP |
Total Pages | : 198 |
Release | : 1996 |
Genre | : Canada |
ISBN | : 9780773514317 |
Download Limiting Rights Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
Hiebert (political studies, Queen's U.) discusses the issue of who should be responsible for determining whether Canadian legislation conflicting with the rights of the Charter should be upheld as a reasonable limit on protected rights. She provides an extended analysis of Supreme Court decisions involving limits on protected rights, the issues surrounding judicial review, and the considerable influence exerted by Canadian politician over which legislation is considered for review. Canadian card order number C96-900197-5. Annotation copyright by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR
Comparative Judicial Review
Author | : Erin F. Delaney,Rosalind Dixon |
Publsiher | : Edward Elgar Publishing |
Total Pages | : 464 |
Release | : 2018-09-28 |
Genre | : Law |
ISBN | : 9781788110600 |
Download Comparative Judicial Review Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
Constitutional courts around the world play an increasingly central role in day-to-day democratic governance. Yet scholars have only recently begun to develop the interdisciplinary analysis needed to understand this shift in the relationship of constitutional law to politics. This edited volume brings together the leading scholars of constitutional law and politics to provide a comprehensive overview of judicial review, covering theories of its creation, mechanisms of its constraint, and its comparative applications, including theories of interpretation and doctrinal developments. This book serves as a single point of entry for legal scholars and practitioners interested in understanding the field of comparative judicial review in its broader political and social context.
The Doctrine of Judicial Review
Author | : Edward Samuel Corwin |
Publsiher | : The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. |
Total Pages | : 236 |
Release | : 2001 |
Genre | : Law |
ISBN | : UOM:39015056936324 |
Download The Doctrine of Judicial Review Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
Five essays examine the concept of "judicial review" from a historical perspective. The term is defined as the power and duty of a court to disregard ultra vires legislative acts.
A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review
Author | : W. J. Waluchow |
Publsiher | : Cambridge University Press |
Total Pages | : 7 |
Release | : 2006-12-25 |
Genre | : Philosophy |
ISBN | : 9781139462815 |
Download A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
In this study, W. J. Waluchow argues that debates between defenders and critics of constitutional bills of rights presuppose that constitutions are more or less rigid entities. Within such a conception, constitutions aspire to establish stable, fixed points of agreement and pre-commitment, which defenders consider to be possible and desirable, while critics deem impossible and undesirable. Drawing on reflections about the nature of law, constitutions, the common law, and what it is to be a democratic representative, Waluchow urges a different theory of bills of rights that is flexible and adaptable. Adopting such a theory enables one not only to answer to critics' most serious challenges, but also to appreciate the role that a bill of rights, interpreted and enforced by unelected judges, can sensibly play in a constitutional democracy.
Weak Courts Strong Rights
Author | : Mark Tushnet |
Publsiher | : Princeton University Press |
Total Pages | : 288 |
Release | : 2009-07-20 |
Genre | : Political Science |
ISBN | : 9781400828159 |
Download Weak Courts Strong Rights Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
Unlike many other countries, the United States has few constitutional guarantees of social welfare rights such as income, housing, or healthcare. In part this is because many Americans believe that the courts cannot possibly enforce such guarantees. However, recent innovations in constitutional design in other countries suggest that such rights can be judicially enforced--not by increasing the power of the courts but by decreasing it. In Weak Courts, Strong Rights, Mark Tushnet uses a comparative legal perspective to show how creating weaker forms of judicial review may actually allow for stronger social welfare rights under American constitutional law. Under "strong-form" judicial review, as in the United States, judicial interpretations of the constitution are binding on other branches of government. In contrast, "weak-form" review allows the legislature and executive to reject constitutional rulings by the judiciary--as long as they do so publicly. Tushnet describes how weak-form review works in Great Britain and Canada and discusses the extent to which legislatures can be expected to enforce constitutional norms on their own. With that background, he turns to social welfare rights, explaining the connection between the "state action" or "horizontal effect" doctrine and the enforcement of social welfare rights. Tushnet then draws together the analysis of weak-form review and that of social welfare rights, explaining how weak-form review could be used to enforce those rights. He demonstrates that there is a clear judicial path--not an insurmountable judicial hurdle--to better enforcement of constitutional social welfare rights.
Judicial Review and Contemporary Democratic Theory
Author | : Scott E. Lemieux,David J. Watkins |
Publsiher | : Routledge |
Total Pages | : 296 |
Release | : 2017-11-03 |
Genre | : Political Science |
ISBN | : 9781351602129 |
Download Judicial Review and Contemporary Democratic Theory Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
For decades, the question of judicial review’s status in a democratic political system has been adjudicated through the framework of what Alexander Bickel labeled "the counter-majoritarian difficulty." That is, the idea that judicial review is particularly problematic for democracy because it opposes the will of the majority. Judicial Review and Contemporary Democratic Theory begins with an assessment of the empirical and theoretical flaws of this framework, and an account of the ways in which this framework has hindered meaningful investigation into judicial review’s value within a democratic political system. To replace the counter-majoritarian difficulty framework, Scott E. Lemieux and David J. Watkins draw on recent work in democratic theory emphasizing democracy’s opposition to domination and analyses of constitutional court cases in the United States, Canada, and elsewhere to examine judicial review in its institutional and political context. Developing democratic criteria for veto points in a democratic system and comparing them to each other against these criteria, Lemieux and Watkins yield fresh insights into judicial review’s democratic value. This book is essential reading for students of law and courts, judicial politics, legal theory and constitutional law.
Immigration Judicial Reviews
Author | : Robert Thomas,Joe Tomlinson |
Publsiher | : Springer Nature |
Total Pages | : 240 |
Release | : 2022-01-01 |
Genre | : Social Science |
ISBN | : 9783030889272 |
Download Immigration Judicial Reviews Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
This book analyses how the system of immigration judicial reviews works in practice, as an area which has, for decades, constituted the majority of judicial review cases and is politically controversial. Drawing upon extensive empirical research and unprecedented research access, it explores who brings judicial review challenges against immigration decisions and why, the type of immigration decisions that are challenged, how cases proceed through the judicial review process, how cases are settled out of court, and how judicial review interacts with other legal and non-legal remedies. It also examines the quality of immigration judicial review claims and the quality of the initial administrative decisions being challenged. Through developing a novel account of the operation of the immigration judicial review system in practice and the lived experience of it by judges, representatives, and claimants, this book adds a significant new perspective to the wider understanding of judicial review.