Oecd Development Co Operation Peer Reviews Oecd Development Assistance Peer Reviews European Union 2012

This report assesses the extent to which the development policies, strategies and activities of the European Union meet the standards set by the DAC.

This report assesses the extent to which the development policies, strategies and activities of Finland meet the standards set by the DAC.

This peer review of Ireland reviews its development policies and programmes. It assesses not just the performance of its development co-operation agency, but also policy and implementation.

Korea is often cited as a leading example of how sound economic policies can drive growth and development, blazing a trail from poverty to advanced industrialisation throughout the 1970s and 1980s.

This report assesses the extent to which the development policies, strategies and activities of Canada meet the standards set by the OECD Development Assistance Committee.

Among other issues, this review looks at how the European Union has shown leadership in forging global agreements on sustainable development and climate change, and suggests the enhancement of a whole of EU approach in focusing on poverty reduction and countries that are most in need.

This report draws out some common themes or lessons regarding capacity development from the DAC peer reviews, including technical co-operation which is one of the main forms of DAC members’ assistance to partner countries. The lessons are focused on ...

The OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) conducts peer reviews of individual members once every five to six years. Reviews seek to improve the quality and effectiveness of members’ development co-operation, highlighting good practices and recommending improvements.