Policy Towards North Korea For Peace Reconciliation And Cooperation

This title was first published in 2003. After the inter-Korean Summit in 2000, the Korean peace process gained a new momentum and the two Koreas increased mutual contacts and exchanges. However, in 2001 the peace process stalled and was further hindered by Bush's hard-line policy towards Pyongyang and North Korea's inflexible attitudes towards Seoul. Interest in the Korean peninsula by the US, Russia, Japan and China, for geo-strategic and geo-economic reasons means that peace and unification will inevitably become an international problem. Against this backdrop, this original volume deals with the problems and prospects of the inter-Korean peace process and the interests, attitudes and policies of these major powers.

The debate in South Korea over the government's engagement policy toward North Korea (the "sunshine" policy) did not start with Pyongyang's recent admission that it has been secretly pursuing a nuclear weapons program in violation of multiple international commitments. However, the evolution of the debate will be an important determinant of how the South Korean and broader international response to this latest North Korean challenge ultimately ends. This book provides a framework for viewing South Korean responses to this challenge, examining the South Korean debate over policies toward the North, analyzing the sources of controversy, and assessing their implications.

This task force, co-chaired by Morton I. Abramowitz and James T. Laney, argues that successful implementation of the Agreed Framework between the United States and North Korea, which froze Pyongyang's known nuclear program in exchange for two light-water reactors and other economic benefits, faces considerable challenges.

"This is an English version of a book originally published in Korean, about the much-acclaimed "engagement policy" towards North Korea, often dubbed the "sunshine policy", as the official Northern policy of the Kim Dae-jung's "government of the people" in South Korea...The book is the product of collective discussions at the Society for Northeast Asian Peace Studies (SNAPS), a Seoul-based non-governmental institution for both scholars and officials specialising in the subject of Northeast Asian affairs and the issue of Korean unification"--P. 5.

Seminar paper from the year 2013 in the subject Politics - Region: Far East, grade: 3,0, University of Vienna, language: English, abstract: This paper shows the achievements of the Sunshine Policy with the help of the official statistics from the website of the Ministry of Unification, South Korea. Therefore the paper presents major statistics of inter-Korean relations, like inter-Korean talks, tourism, humanitarian aid and private exchange. The paper will compare the numbers of the Sunshine Policy (therefore between 1998 and 2008) and the numbers before (was not always possible) and the numbers after the Sunshine Policy.

This Independent Task Force Report addresses the challenges of balancing diplomacy and deterrence in this next critical stage on the Korean peninsula.

The classic national security concerns of nuclear proliferation and the production, sale and use of weapons of mass destruction cannot be addressed in the Korean peninsula without at the same time considering the implications and interrelationship of what are these days known as the human security issues of food, poverty and, perhaps more controversially, freedom.We agree that East Asia and the world are more dangerous with the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (the DPRK or North Korea) in possession of nuclear weapons. It is also argued, however, that a comprehensive security analysis identifies many equally significant threats to regional security, such as the risk from industrial and nuclear accidents and the potential for transborder crime arising from the lack of legal and productive avenues for economic activity for North Korea's poverty-stricken citizens. In this book Korea, soft security issues are as important as hard security matters and that the latter cannot be understood, or its dilemmas unravelled, without a clear engagement with the former.This book looks at Korean security dilemmas from the perspective of the various international actors, not just from the viewpoint of the major protagonists the DPRK and the United States. We show that different states and international organizations have different and multiple interests in their relationships with the DPRK and with each other.