Role Of The State In The Economy

This research review covers the main theories and justifications for and against state intervention as they have developed over two centuries. It also incorporates an institutional approach to the role of the state in enforcing "the rules of the game" of the economy as well as examining specific issues including market failure, rent-seeking and regulation. Economists and political scientists alike will find this to be the ideal guide to the classic and modern arguments surrounding the state's role in the economy.

Recoge: Introduction Peter J. Boettke and Peter T. Leeson PART ICLASSICAL ARGUMENTS FOR LAISSEZ FAIRE 1. David Hume (1985 [1777]), ‘Of the Independency of Parliament’, in Eugene F. Miller (ed.), Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, Essay VI, Indianapolis, IN, USA: Liberty Fund, Inc., 42–46 2. David Hume (2000), ‘Of the Origin of Justice and Property’, ‘Of the Rules, Which Determine Property’ and ‘Of the Transference of Property By Consent’, in David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton (eds), A Treatise of Human Nature, Book 3: Part 2: Section 2, Section 3 and Section 4, Oxford, UK and New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 311–31 3. Adam Smith (1961 [1776]), ‘Of the Sources of the General or Public Revenue of the Society’, in Edwin Cannan (ed.), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth Of Nations, Book V, Chapter II, London, UK: Methuen & Co. Ltd, 341–440 4. Frédéric Bastiat (1850 [2007]), The Law, Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1–55 5. Jean-Baptiste Say (2001 [1880]), ‘Of the Effect of Government Regulations Intended to Influence Production’, in A Treatise on Political Economy, Book I, Chapter XVII, Ontario, Canada: Batoche Books, [translated by C.R. Prinsep], 60–83 6. Simon Newcomb (1870), ‘The Let-Alone Principle’, North American Review, CCXXVI (226), January, 1–33 7. Herbert Spencer (1981 [1843]), ‘The Proper Sphere of Government’, in The Man Versus the State: With Six Essays on Government, Society, and Freedom, Indianapolis, IN, USA: Liberty Fund, Inc., 181–263 PART IICRITICS OF LAISSEZ FAIRE 8. John Stuart Mill (1909 [1848]), ‘Of the Grounds and Limits of the Laisser-faire or Non-interference Principle’, in Principals of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, Book IV, Chapter XI, London, UK: Longmans, Green and Co., 304–46 9. John Maynard Keynes (2012 [1926]), ‘The End of Laissez-Faire’, in Elizabeth Johnson and Donald Moggridge (eds), The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Volume IX: Essays in Persuasion, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 272–94 10. R.G. Tugwell (1932), ‘The Principle of Planning and the Institution of Laissez Faire’, American Economic Review, 22 (1), March, 75–92 11. J.E. Meade (1954), ‘External Economies and Diseconomies in a Competitive Situation’, Economic Journal, 62 (245), March, 54–67 12. Paul A. Samuelson (1954), ‘The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 36 (4), November, 387–9 13. Francis M. Bator (1958), ‘The Anatomy of Market Failure’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72 (3), August, 351–79 14. George J. Stigler and Paul A. Samuelson (1963), ‘A Dialogue on the Proper Economic Role of the State’, Selected Papers No. 7, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, 3–39 PART IIITHE RESTATEMENT OF LAISSEZ FAIRE 15. Ludwig von Mises (2005), ‘Liberal Economic Policy’, Liberalism: The Classical Tradition, Chapter 2, Indianapolis, IN, USA: Liberty Fund, Inc., 37–75 16. Friedrich A. Hayek (1980), ‘Individualism: True and False’, in Individualism and Economic Order, Chapter I, Chicago, IL, USA and London, UK: University of Chicago Press, 1–32 17. R.H. Coase (1959), ‘The Federal Communications Commission’, Journal of Law and Economics, II, October, 1–40 18. R.H. Coase (1960), ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economics, III, October, 1–44 19. Murray N. Rothbard (1974), ‘The Anatomy of the State’, in Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature and Other Essays, Washington, DC, USA: Libertarian Review Press, 34–53 20. James M. Buchanan (1976), ‘The Justice of Natural Liberty’, Journal of Legal Studies, 5 (1), January, 1–16 21. Gordon Tullock (1967), ‘The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft’, Western Economic Journal, 5 (3), June, 224–32 22. Armen A. Alchian (2006), ‘Some Economics of Property Rights’, in The Collected Works of Armen A. Alchian, Volume 2: Property Rights and Economic Behavior, Part 1, Indianapolis, IN, USA: Liberty Fund, Inc., 52–67 23. Mancur Olson (1993), ‘Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development’, American Political Science Review, 87 (3), September, 567–76 PART IVMODERN POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LAISSEZ FAIRE 24. David Friedman (1989), ‘What is Anarchy? What is Government?’, in The Machinery of Freedom: Guide to a Radical Capitalism, Chapter 28, New Rochelle, NY, USA: Arlington Publishers, 151–4 25. Jack Hirshleifer (1995), ‘Anarchy and its Breakdown’, Journal of Political Economy, 103 (1), February, 26–52 26. Avinash K. Dixit (2004), ‘Economics With and Without the Law’, in Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative Modes of Governance, Chapter 1, Princeton, NJ, USA and Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press, 1–23, references 27. James E. Rauch (2005), ‘Getting the Properties Right to Secure Property Rights: Dixit’s Lawlessness and Economics’, Journal of Economic Literature, XLIII (2), June, 480–7 28. Timothy Frye and Andrei Shleifer (1997), ‘The Invisible Hand and the Grabbing Hand’, American Economic Review, 87 (2), May, 354–8 29. Andrei Shleifer (2009), ‘The Age of Milton Friedman’, Journal of Economic Literature, XLVII (1), March, 123–35 30. Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson (2005), ‘Unbundling Institutions’, Journal of Political Economy, 113 (5), October, 949–95 31. Barry R. Weingast (1995), ‘The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development’, Journal of Law and Economic Organization, 11 (1), April, 1–31.

This paper discusses the role of the state from a historical perspective. It outlines how that role has changed over the past hundred years and discusses the forces that have promoted the changes. In the period between 1913 and 1980, there was a large increase in public spending in industrial countries and a considerable expansion in the role of the government in the economy in all countries. The paper also outlines the intellectual developments that, starting in the 1970s, have brought about a reaction to the large role that the state has come to play in the economy.

Up-to-date, holistic and comprehensive discussion of public expenditure, its history, value for money, risks and remedies.

Ha-Joon Chang evaluates the role of the state in economics and development. In this collection of essays, he reviews theories and practices of state intervention as they have developed over two centuries of modern capitalism. He develops an institutionalist approach to the role of the state in economic change, and examines the issues involved in particular settings including industrial policy, trade policy, intellectual property rights, regulation, and strategies towards transnational corporations. He mounts a sophisticated theoretical and historical case for the continuing essential and constructive roles which the state can and must play in economic development.

State-owned enterprises (SOEs) combine economic activities resulting from their position on the market with non-economic functions determined by the state owner. In many of the world’s major economies, SOEs play an important role, and in some, such as China, India, Russia and Brazil, they are outright dominant. At the same time, the existence of SOEs is largely ignored by economic theory and the current figures on SOEs on a global scale available in the literature are questionable in terms of their methodological validity and thus they do not allow for a proper cross-country analysis. This book fills this research gap. It focuses on the scope and importance of SOEs in a broad group of the largest economies, primarily on a variety of quantitative estimates. It contains the results of an extensive and unique empirical study of 37 of the world’s largest economies over the period from 2009 to 2018. The findings showed that the average share of SOEs – measured by operating revenues and total assets – in the group of the largest 100 enterprises (Top 100) of a given country is nearly 30%, while in the Top 20 group it is even slightly higher. The authors present an econometric analysis showing the relationship between the scope of SOEs and the various economic and non-economic characteristics of the studied set of countries. The book also contains an in-depth discussion of selected key issues, such as the functions of SOEs in various types of economies, the role of SOEs in capital markets and the phenomenon of SOEs with foreign capital. This work is addressed to both academic economists, dealing with macroeconomics and economic policy, as well as researchers and analysts from various international organizations and think-tanks.

Award-winning economist Mariana Mazzucato’s famously incisive international bestseller debunking the pervasive myth of the inept state versus an innovative private sector—with a new preface by the author According to conventional wisdom, innovation is best left to the bold entrepreneurs of the private sector, and government should get out of the way. But what if that wasn't case? What if, from the inventions of Silicon Valley to medical breakthroughs, the public sector has actually been the most courageous and valuable risk-taker of all? Critically acclaimed and influential thinker and scholar Mariana Mazzucato argues comprehensively against the myth of a lumbering, bureaucratic state versus a dynamic, innovative private sector with remarkable original and deep research. In a series of case studies—from nanotechnology to the emerging green tech of today—Mazzucato reveals that the opposite is true: the private sector only finds the courage to invest after an entrepreneurial state has made the high-risk investments. The Entrepreneurial State reveals how every technology that makes the iPhone so “smart” was actually funded by the government—from the Internet and GPS technology, to touch-screen displays and voice-activated Siri. In the history of modern capitalism, the State has not only fixed market failures, but has also actively shaped and created markets. In doing so, it sometimes wins and sometimes fails. Yet by not admitting the State’s role in active risk taking, we've created an "innovation system" where the public sector socializes risks while privatizing reward, as Mazzucato controversially argues. This bold and provocative book considers how we adopted this dysfunctional dynamic, and then how we can overcome it so that economic growth can be not only "smart" but "inclusive" as well.

p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 10.0px Arial} A Modern Guide to State Intervention investigates the impact of the changing role of the state, offering an alternative political economy for the third decade of the twenty-first century. Building on important factors including history, the role of institutions, society and economic structures, this Modern Guide considers economic and administrative interventions towards changing the destabilized status quo of modern societies.