Tax Planning For U S Mncs With Eu Holding Companies

Tax planning for U.S. companies doing business in the EU. Analyses the design of tax conversion and deferral structures that are advantageous to U.S. multinationals to reach their goals: minimizing liability, maximizing credits, deducting expenses, and utilizing losses; using tools such as routing of income and classification of entities; and overcoming barriers like the CFC provisions of the U.S. tax law. Examines U.S. federal corporate law and analyses European company taxation, with specific tax planning techniques for Germany, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Austria, Denmark, Ireland, Spain, Luxembourg, and Switzerland.

The book deals with tax planning with holding companies located in Europe, Asia of the Caribbean. It analyses the problem of repatriating U.S. profits from Europe, going far beyond the routing of income via different companies. Instead, the approach includes an analysis of the interdependencies between international tax competition, holding company regimes, and tax planning concepts in order to establish a basis for tax planning measures regardless of the fast changing legal environment for holding companies in the different countries.

When investments don't live up to their promise, the situation is typically due to several factors. In most cases, the key reasons are a combination of the place of investment, the product, and the selection of detrimental tax planning measures. Often, international tax planning tips the scales regarding the success of a U.S. investment in Europe. This timely book analyzes concepts and structures that can be used as a ""construction kit"" applying combinations of basic tools to meet the challenges of an ever-changing global tax environment. In the wake of globalization, a host of n.

Collection of articles providing an insight in the current status of tax treaties in Latin American and Caribbean countries, and dealing with holding companies and technical assistance, royalty and service payments.

The author highlights the principle planning techniques which are available to multinational enterprises such as international holding and finance companies, royalty routeing and international licensing, service companies and captive insurance companies.

The tax rules of the United States and other countries have intended and unintended effects on the operations of multinational corporations, influencing everything from the formation and allocation of capital to competitive strategies. The growing importance of international business has led economists to reconsider whether current systems of taxing international income are viable in a world of significant capital market integration and global commercial competition. In an attempt to quantify the effect of tax policy on international investment choices, this volume presents in-depth analyses of the interaction of international tax rules and the investment decisions of multinational enterprises. Ten papers assess the role played by multinational firms and their investment in the U.S. economy and the design of international tax rules for multinational investment; analyze channels through which international tax rules affect the costs of international business activities; and examine ways in which international tax rules affect financing decisions of multinational firms. As a group, the papers demonstrate that international tax rules have significant effects on firms' investment and other financing decisions.

This paper reviews the rapidly growing empirical literature on international tax avoidance by multinational corporations. It surveys evidence on main channels of corporate tax avoidance including transfer mispricing, international debt shifting, treaty shopping, tax deferral and corporate inversions. Moreover, it performs a meta analysis of the extensive literature that estimates the overall size of profit shifting. We find that the literature suggests that, on average, a 1 percentage-point lower corporate tax rate will expand before-tax income by 1 percent—an effect that is larger than reported as the consensus estimate in previous surveys and tends to be increasing over time. The literature on tax avoidance still has several unresolved puzzles and blind spots that require further research.