Judicial Review Of Criminal Proceedings

Judicial Review of Criminal Proceedings provides the first dedicated and up-to-date treatment of judicial review as it applies at all stages of the criminal process. It considers the remedies and procedure of judicial review and focuses upon the areas that have occupied the courts in recent years, such as: delay and the right to a fair trial; blameworthy prosecutorial delay; the scope of the duty to seek out and preserve evidence; the circumstances in which judicial review will lie in respect of convictions and sentences recorded in the District Court and Circuit Court; pre-trial disclosure; review of prosecutorial discretion; adverse pre-trial publicity etc. The text also considers the impact of all important recent decisions of the Superior Courts such as PH v DPP; PM v DPP; McFarlane v DPP; Cormack & Farrell v DPP; O'Keeffe v Connellan; McNulty v DPP; DS v Judge of the Southern Circuit; and Meadows v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform. Contents: Judicial Review and the Criminal Law In Context; Remedies, Practice and Procedure; Judicial Review, the District Court and the Circuit Court; Judicial Review and the Special Criminal Court; The Right to a Fair Trial and Delay; The Right to an Expeditious Trial and Blameworthy Prosecutorial Delay; The Duty to Seek Out and Preserve Evidence; Review of the Decisions and Conduct of the Prosecuting Authorities; Precedents of Pleadings. Derek Dunne is a practising barrister.

Any practitioner faced with the decision as to whether to appeal, or who has questions arising at each stage, will benefit enormously from a book that examines the law, principles, procedures, and processes involved. This leading work has been updated and restructured, to ensure it provides guidance on the complete and complex process of making a civil appeal. Clearly written and cross referenced, the books UK/European coverage of appeals includes: -- District Judges to Circuit Judges in the County Court -- Masters and District Judges to High Court Judges -- Court of Appeal -- House of Lords -- Privy Council -- The European Court -- The European Court of Human Rights -- Administrative Law and Elections

​This book proposes and outlines a comprehensive framework for judicial protection in transnational criminal proceedings that ensures the right to judicial review without hampering the effective functioning of international cooperation in criminal matters. It examines a broad range of potential approaches in the context of selected national criminal justice systems, and offers a comparative analysis of EU Member States and non-Member States alike. The book particularly focuses on the differences between cooperation within the EU on the one hand and cooperation with third states on the other, and on the consequences of this distinction for the scope of judicial review.

Judicial Review: A Practical Guide is a handbook which aims to be a first port of call in all matters concerning judicial review applications, whether in civil or criminal proceedings. This new edition has been significantly amended to take account of the following developments in law and practice, including: * Development of the Unified Tribunal system with transfers of judicial reviews * Regionalisation of Administrative Court * Clear development of mistake of fact as a mistake of law * Increasing understanding of the impact of the Human Rights Act * Limitations upon judicial review in the context of immigration * Ongoing case-law developments * Changes to Appeals (CPR Pt 52) * Developments in costs and funding In addition to the authors' commentary, Judicial Review: A Practical Guide contains over 20 precedents covering all aspects of the litigation process, together with all the main legislative and judicial materials.

This is a comprehensive guide to challenging decisions of criminal courts and public bodies in the criminal justice system using judicial review. Written by a team of criminal and public law practitioners, it considers claims for judicial review arising in the criminal justice system, which now represent a distinct area of public law. These claims are set apart by special considerations and rules; for example, on the limits of the High Court's jurisdiction or the availability of relief during ongoing proceedings. Criminal practitioners may lack the background to spot public law points. Equally, public law specialists may be unfamiliar with criminal law and types of issues that arise. Criminal Judicial Review is intended as a resource for both. The book deals with the principles, case law, remedies and, the practice and procedure for obtaining legal aid and costs. It will be of assistance to any practitioner preparing or responding to judicial review claims involving the following: - The Police and the Crown Prosecution Service. - Magistrates' courts, the Crown Court and Coroners. - Prisons and the Parole Board. - Statutory bodies such as the Independent Police Complaints Commission and the Legal Aid Agency. - Claimants who are children, young persons or have mental disorders. - The international dimension including extradition proceedings and European Union law. - Practical considerations such as CPR Part 54, remedies, legal aid and costs. From the Foreword by The Rt Hon Lord Judge “The book is offered in clear and simple style, focussing less on esoteric theoretical considerations and more on the practical needs of the practitioner. It brings together materials relating to public law with which a criminal specialist may be less well informed, and material relevant to the criminal justice processes which may not be immediately apparent to the public law specialist. It will assist with the preparation of arguments, and also enable submissions which are unarguable to be discarded. It will therefore provide valuable guidance in this broad and developing area of practice.”

The Law Commission was asked to examine the criminal jurisdiction of the High Court over the Crown Court, and the focus on this report is on the two means by which decisions of the way of case stated and judicial review from the Crown Court Crown Court can be challenged: by appeal to the High Court by way of case stated, and by application to the High Court for judicial review. This report follows on from a consultation paper issued in 2007 (no 184, ISBN 9780118404440) and the responses to it. The Commission recommends: abolishing appeal by case stated from the Crown Court to the High Court in criminal proceedings; reforming the law on judicial review of the Crown Court in criminal proceedings so that judicial review of decisions in a trial on indictment is barred from the time the case goes to the Crown Court for trial to the end of the trial, with an exception where the judge refuses bail; a new statutory appeal for a child or young person, where the trial judge refuses to restrict reporting to protect his or her identity; and a new statutory appeal where the trial judge's ruling entails a real and immediate risk to a person's life.