Sweet Science

Today we do not expect poems to carry scientifically valid information. But it was not always so. In Sweet Science, Amanda Jo Goldstein returns to the beginnings of the division of labor between literature and science to recover a tradition of Romantic life writing for which poetry was a privileged technique of empirical inquiry. Goldstein puts apparently literary projects, such as William Blake’s poetry of embryogenesis, Goethe’s journals On Morphology, and Percy Shelley’s “poetry of life,” back into conversation with the openly poetic life sciences of Erasmus Darwin, J. G. Herder, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, and Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire. Such poetic sciences, Goldstein argues, share in reviving Lucretius’s De rerum natura to advance a view of biological life as neither self-organized nor autonomous, but rather dependent on the collaborative and symbolic processes that give it viable and recognizable form. They summon De rerum natura for a logic of life resistant to the vitalist stress on self-authorizing power and to make a monumental case for poetry’s role in the perception and communication of empirical realities. The first dedicated study of this mortal and materialist dimension of Romantic biopoetics, Sweet Science opens a through-line between Enlightenment materialisms of nature and Marx’s coming historical materialism.

'When that bell rings, your life is entirely in your hands.' London, 1869. Four very different Victorian women are drawn into the dark underground world of female boxing by the eccentric Professor Sharp. Controlled by men and constrained by corsets, each finds an unexpected freedom in the boxing ring. As their lives begin to intertwine, their journey takes us through grand drawing rooms, bustling theatres and rowdy Southwark pubs, where the women fight inequality as well as each other. But with the final showdown approaching, only one can become the Lady Boxing Champion of the World... Joy Wilkinson's play The Sweet Science of Bruising is an epic tale of passion, politics and pugilism. It premiered at Southwark Playhouse, London, in October 2018, in a production by Troupe.

Take a ringside seat next to A. J. Liebling at some of the greatest fights in history. Here is Joe Louis's devastating final match; Sugar Ray Robinson's dramatic comeback; and Rocky Marciano's rise to heavyweight glory. The heated ringside atmosphere, the artistry of the great boxers and the blows and parries of the classic fights are all vividly evoked in a volume described by Sports Illustrated as 'the best American sports book of all time'. 'A rollicking god among boxing writers ... before Tom Wolfe and Hunter S. Thompson were out of diapers, Liebling was taking his readers on excursions through the hidden and often hilarious levels of this bruised subculture ... the Master' Los Angeles Times 'Nobody wrote about boxing with more grace and enthusiasm' The New York Times

Introduction: "sweet science" -- Blake's mundane egg: epigenesis and milieux -- Equivocal life: Goethe's journals on morphology -- Tender semiosis: reading Goethe with Lucretius and Paul de Man -- Growing old together: Lucretian materialism in Shelley's The triumph of life -- A natural history of violence: allegory and atomism in Shelley's The mask of anarchy -- Coda: old materialism, or romantic Marx

Welcome To The 2013 Award Winning, Most Unique Booksite By Most Unique Award Winning Author J.P.L. Lubek!!! archive.is/YhQYx = educalingo.com/en/dic-pl/lubek “strong>Cena Mówi o Jakoci> LUBEK'S LEGACY: THE CHESS CASTLE 2000/0000 MOVE: archive.is/c2TdS, archive.is/949sw In My First Book: Rocky Marciano & Classic Boxing & Boxers are discussed, also comparison to new era boxers are mentioned. Me & my Dearest Grandma, the ever-wise Venerabilis Wanda Wladyslawa Nida (PTASZYNA ZLOCISTA) mother of Golden-Heart Grazyna Maria Nida, daughter of decorated mining engineer Tadeusz Nida, son of Postmaster Rudolf Nida) (encyclopediasupreme.org/Babcia, encyclopediasupreme.org/Philosophy/Warpeace.txt Wanda's Eternal Words of Wisdom) introduced the idea to the promise breaking WBC/Sulaiman family: archive.is/eVoto to erect Rocky Marciano statue in Brockton who owes us huge gratitude. You will find out lots of information on Rocky (and on many other topics, especially classic boxing) you never knew before. Special attention is given to Rocky's exhibitions in Asia (especially in Japan) & Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Archie Moore was not the last fighter Rocky faced in the ring in front of a live audience because it happened in Brazil in March of 1956 against 3 opponents. The last fight was for real!!! November 2022 Update: Rocky fought 2 rounds each against: Nelson Andrade, Antônio Cândido (replaced Francisco de Assis) & Waldemar Adao: 1956 & 1957 Brazilian heavyweight champion. There is lots of information on 'The Super Fight' film Rocky had with Muhamed Ali shortly before he died as if God waited for this fight to happen. Discover Rocky's many weird business ventures & his care-free investments, his life during & after boxing. Find out why Rocky's only logical opponent 'Big' Bob Baker 45-5 (special chapter is dedicated to him, also to Rocky's Amateur 10-4 (8KOs) record) was supposed to be Rocky's opponent on February 3 1956? Why was Sonny Liston (Rocky almost became his manager in 1961) not included in the elimination tournament to choose Rocky's 1956 Fall Opponent? Did Rocky avoid Floyd Patterson, Bob Satterfield, John Holman, Johnny Summerlin, and undefeated Eddie Machen for the 1957 New Year's fight? In My Second Book: George 'Superman' Reeves & Paul Bern (among others) are covered. Find out who might have murdered them. Were Toni & Eddie Mannix behind 'foul play'? Did they play a key role in his death? Toni bombarded George with harassing calls even when he changed phone numbers. Find out who stole George's pet dog. Find out about George's wish to be a pro boxer & a pro wrestler. Find out about the Luger gun that killed George. Was it possible to play Russian roulette with it? Read about how Jack Larson almost filmed 13 episodes of 'Superman's Pal' but refused because it was morbid to him. In My Third Book: History of Reproducing Piano Rolls, I describe in details (especially from technical aspects) different companies who made piano rolls for piano players, player pianos (Pianolas) & reproducing pianos at the turn of the 20th century. I cover piano rolls making companies such as Duo-Art, Welte-Mignon (Welte & Sons from Freiburg, Germany), Ampico A & B & many others. I cover the story of the first Piano Player Vorsetzer, an original machine with wooden fingers which played the piano, reproducing the sounds of great masters like Paderewski, Leshetizky, Saint-Saens, Scriabin, Lhevinne, Hofmann & many others. Even if they are no longer with us their spirit lives on in these (reproducing) piano rolls. "Genius Never Dies" Venerable Wanda Nida always said In Latin: "Dignum Laude Virum, Musa Vetat Mori!!!" Sooner or later we all have to go but memories of our names live on. There is life in memories. As long as one is regularly remembered he/she never dies!!! encyclopediasupreme.org/Time MARCHES ON, IT SHOWS MERCY TO NO ONE!!! ~J.P.L. LUBEK~ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUBLIC AWARENESS MESSAGE: CONFIRMED TRUE & ESSENTIAL INFO ON WIKIMEGALOMANIAC WIKIBASTARD JIMMY DONAL WALES' (KING NOTHING, GLOBALLY, INFINITELY BLOCK ED WIKI LOSER, WIFE CHEATING PORN KING: encyclopediadramatica.online/User:Jimbo_Wales just like his umbrella for wikiterrorism: encyclopediadramatica.online/User:WMFOffice) WIKIPEDIA (WIKI-PEDO-IA) WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION (WMF = THE "INTELLECTUAL" TRAGEDY OF THE 21ST CENTURY) DISINFORMATION/MISINFORMATION; WIKIPEDIA-WATCH RESURRECTED: archive.vn/CsyKa & archive.vn/Y0BB WIKIPEEDOIA BLOG: archive.is/k1iQk TRUE SIMILAR, CRITICAL COMMENTS, ETERNAL WIKISHAME ON FOREVER & EVER UNFORGIVEN WIKISCUM ETERNAL: archive.is/tg5A7 THEY WILL NEVER CREMATE!!! WHY NEVER, EVER SUPPORT WMF: xahlee.info/w/do_not_donate_to_Wikipedia.html IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM!?! IT'S CENSORED SATANIC "ENCYCLOPEDIA" WHERE ANYTHING GOES; ONE CAN'T GET MORE WIKISTUPID THAN ON WIKI-PEDO-IA WHERE UTMOST WIKISTUPIDITY & WMF BS MUST HAPPEN 24/7. YOU WILL BE BLOCKED FOR ANY REASON (encyclopediadramatica.online/User:Bbb23 WIKIRACIST ASSHOLE SUPREME IS BEST AT IT: archive.is/TyMT3, youtube.com/watch?v=bSQYxGkOvXA) WIKISHIT HAS TO GROW EXPONENTIALLY EVERY DAY!!!

Sports fans have long been fascinated with boxing and the brutal demonstration of physical and psychological conflict. Accounts of the sport appear as far back as the third millennium BC, and Greek and Roman sculptors depicted the athletic ideals of the ancient era in the form of boxers. In the present day, boxers such as Muhammad Ali, Joe Frazier, Sugar Ray Robinson, Oscar De La Hoya, Manny Pacquiao, and Floyd Mayweather, Jr. are recognized throughout the world. Boxing films continue to resonate with audiences, from the many Rocky movies to Raging Bull, The Fighter, Million Dollar Baby, and Ali. In Boxing: A Concise History of the Sweet Science, Gerald R. Gems provides a succinct yet wide ranging treatment of the sport, covering boxing’s ancient roots and its evolution, modernization, and global diffusion. The book not only includes a historical account of boxing, but also explores such issues as social class, race, ethnic rivalries, religious influences, gender issues, and the growth of female boxing. The current debates over the moral and ethical issues relative to the sport are also discussed. While the primary coverage of the political, social, and cultural impacts of boxing focuses on the United States, Gems’ examination encompasses the sport on a global level, as well. Covering important issues and events in the history of boxing and featuring numerous photographs, Boxing: A Concise History of the Sweet Science will be of interest to boxing fans, historians, scholars, and those wanting to learn more about the sport.

A fascinating account for teen readers that captures the history, science, and economic and cultural implications of the harvesting of cacao and creation of chocolate. Readers of Chew On This and The Omnivore's Dilemma will savor this rich exposé.

In the years since Daniel Dennett's influential Consciousness Explained was published in 1991, scientific research on consciousness has been a hotly contested battleground of rival theories—"so rambunctious," Dennett observes, "that several people are writing books just about the tumult." With Sweet Dreams, Dennett returns to the subject for "revision and renewal" of his theory of consciousness, taking into account major empirical advances in the field since 1991 as well as recent theoretical challenges. In Consciousness Explained, Dennett proposed to replace the ubiquitous but bankrupt Cartesian Theater model (which posits a privileged place in the brain where "it all comes together" for the magic show of consciousness) with the Multiple Drafts Model. Drawing on psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and artificial intelligence, he asserted that human consciousness is essentially the mental software that reorganizes the functional architecture of the brain. In Sweet Dreams, he recasts the Multiple Drafts Model as the "fame in the brain" model, as a background against which to examine the philosophical issues that "continue to bedevil the field." With his usual clarity and brio, Dennett enlivens his arguments with a variety of vivid examples. He isolates the "Zombic Hunch" that distorts much of the theorizing of both philosophers and scientists, and defends heterophenomenology, his "third-person" approach to the science of consciousness, against persistent misinterpretations and objections. The old challenge of Frank Jackson's thought experiment about Mary the color scientist is given a new rebuttal in the form of "RoboMary," while his discussion of a famous card trick, "The Tuned Deck," is designed to show that David Chalmers's Hard Problem is probably just a figment of theorists' misexploited imagination. In the final essay, the "intrinsic" nature of "qualia" is compared with the naively imagined "intrinsic value" of a dollar in "Consciousness—How Much is That in Real Money?"