That Is Why Theory Of Special Relativity Is Nonsense

The book presents the author's new evidence that SR is wrong. Among other things, an analysis of k-calculus from the book Introducing Einstein's Relativity by Ray d'Inverno from Oxford University Press is made. The author shows how some researchers use mathematics incorrectly. Mathematics is the queen of science!

The author deals with a number of concepts that occur within the special theory of relativity. - Derivation of Lorentz transformations - Time dilation - Michelson-Morley experiment, 1887 - Twin Paradox, The twin paradox - The third brother - Apparatus for measuring of the absolute velocity in space New i this edition: Published articles The book presents the author's own research on the special theory of relativity. The result of this research shows that the special theory of relativity does not match reality! It contains built-in errors! It is not self-consistent. Special Relativity is Nonsense.

This book contains the great physicist's own explanation of both the special and general theories of relativity. Written for readers interested in the theory but not conversant with the mathematical apparatus of theoretical physics, it presents the ideas in their simplest, most intelligible form.

The Special Theory of Relativity: Based on a short course of lectures delivered in the late 1930s, this short book presents the theory of Special Relativity by formulating a redefinition of the measurement of length, and thus will appeal to students of physics who wish to think through Einstein’s thought without the encumbrance of quasi-scientific concepts and language. Relativity: A Very Elementary Exposition: This brief lecture, delivered in October 1921 and published for the first time in 1925, offers an explanation of Einstein’s theory of Special Relativity for the non-scientist, giving a general overview that does justice both to the actual physics involved, and the wider implications of this revolutionary discovery of the 20th century.

The book presents the theory of relativity as a unified whole. By showing that the concepts of this theory are interrelated to form a unified totality David Bohm supplements some of the more specialist courses which have tended to give students a fragmentary impression of the logical and conceptual nature of physics as a whole.

Conceivably, Einstein's theory of the Special Relativity has been the most criticized theoretical physics work of the 20th century. The theory itself involves some counterintuitive assumptions leading to absurd, rather unrealistic outcomes and paradoxes, giving the theory a kind of a fictitious, surrealistic aspect!Most opponents argue that the theory is mathematically sound, yet its mathematical formulation is based on faulty assumptions. Therefore, most attempts to disprove the Special Relativity have been oriented towards identifying inconsistent or illogical outcomes concluded from its predictions. This book, however, sets forth an analytical study of the Special Relativity formulation. It reveals that the Special Relativity assumptions are inconsistent, resulting in space and time transformations embedding mathematical contradictions. The unviability of the Special Relativity predictions is ascertained through various mathematical arguments, concluding that the theory is actually built upon the interpretations of a theoretical, deceptively plausible linear coordinate transformation—in a hypothetically four dimensional spacetime—derived from not only imaginary assumptions, but contradictory as well!

John D. Frey leads readers on a fascinating journey in this book that seeks to prove that Albert Einsteins theory of special relativity is all wrong. He begins by sharing an overview of special relativity, including its history, principles, and how these principles bring about time dilation and length contraction. The author examines six experiments that show that the theorys claims and principles can disqualify themselves by producing impossible, opposing results. He also explains how experiments that supposedly have verified special relativity and its claims actually help prove that the theory is flawed. Behind this book was over 10 years of research by the author concerning every aspect of special relativity. In addition, the author consulted with over 30 professors of physics concerning his ideas and experiments and their feedback was extremely important in the creation of this book. Written in everyday, nontechnical language, the book will make sense to those without a background in physics. No matter what you do for a living, you can participate in a vital discussion about our universe and join the author in Challenging the Unchallengeable.

Writing a new book on the classic subject of Special Relativity, on which numerous important physicists have contributed and many books have already been written, can be like adding another epicycle to the Ptolemaic cosmology. Furthermore, it is our belief that if a book has no new elements, but simply repeats what is written in the existing literature, perhaps with a different style, then this is not enough to justify its publication. However, after having spent a number of years, both in class and research with relativity, I have come to the conclusion that there exists a place for a new book. Since it appears that somewhere along the way, mathem- ics may have obscured and prevailed to the degree that we tend to teach relativity (and I believe, theoretical physics) simply using “heavier” mathematics without the inspiration and the mastery of the classic physicists of the last century. Moreover current trends encourage the application of techniques in producing quick results and not tedious conceptual approaches resulting in long-lasting reasoning. On the other hand, physics cannot be done a ́ la carte stripped from philosophy, or, to put it in a simple but dramatic context A building is not an accumulation of stones! As a result of the above, a major aim in the writing of this book has been the distinction between the mathematics of Minkowski space and the physics of r- ativity.