The American Journal Of Obstetrics And Diseases Of Women And Children Vol 50

Excerpt from The American Journal of Obstetrics and Diseases of Women and Children, Vol. 50: July-December, 1904 Since this case, I have made it a rule to examine the appendix whenever I was not completely satisfied that the patient's symp toms could be explained by the existing pelvic lesions. Like many another operator, however, I failed to record accurately my observations until some two years ago. Then with the View of throwing some light upon the question considered above I began systematically to remove the appendix in every case where the abdomen was opened for other purposes, unless, in my opinion, the patient's chances of recovery were jeopardized by the addi tional five minutes' time required for the removal. Each appendix thus removed was subjected to careful microscopic examination by Dr. R. L. Morse, pathologist of the gynecologic service of the Hospital of the University of Michigan. His work in turn was supervised by and his results verified in each case by Professor A. S. Warthin, director Of the Pathologic Laboratories of the University of Michigan. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.

Excerpt from The American Journal of Obstetrics and Diseases of Women and Children, Vol. 46: July-December, 1902 Case II. - This case is recorded in the table as No. 32. Oper ated on January 5, 1900, for extrauterine pregnancy. She re turned ou April and was operated on April 26, when a tubo-ovarian cyst on the left side was removed. She complained, on the second occasion, of pains in the abdomen, chiefly on the left side. Had missed one week, but had no uterine hemorrhage. The mass could be felt on physical examination. Case III. - Case No. 13 in the table was operated on for extra uterine pregnancy December 24, 1895. She returned again and was operated on October 19, 1896, for a hydrosalpinx on the left side. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

Excerpt from The American Journal of Obstetrics and Diseases of Women and Children, Vol. 52: July-December, 1905 The second way of improving the results of our therapeutic efforts lies in an improvement of our Operative technic; and it is this last question which forms the sole object of this symposium. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.

Reprint of the original, first published in 1875.