The Epistemology Of Disagreement
Download The Epistemology Of Disagreement full books in PDF, epub, and Kindle. Read online free The Epistemology Of Disagreement ebook anywhere anytime directly on your device. Fast Download speed and no annoying ads. We cannot guarantee that every ebooks is available!
The Epistemology of Disagreement
Author | : David Christensen,Jennifer Lackey |
Publsiher | : Oxford University Press |
Total Pages | : 281 |
Release | : 2013-04-25 |
Genre | : Philosophy |
ISBN | : 9780199698370 |
Download The Epistemology of Disagreement Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
This is a collective study of the epistemic significance of disagreement: 12 contributors explore rival responses to the problems that it raises for philosophy. They develop our understanding of epistemic phenomena that are central to any thoughtful engagement with others' beliefs.
The Epistemic Benefits of Disagreement
Author | : Kirk Lougheed |
Publsiher | : Springer Nature |
Total Pages | : 134 |
Release | : 2019-11-20 |
Genre | : Philosophy |
ISBN | : 9783030345037 |
Download The Epistemic Benefits of Disagreement Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
This book presents an original discussion and analysis of epistemic peer disagreement. It reviews a wide range of cases from the literature, and extends the definition of epistemic peerhood with respect to the current one, to account for the actual variability found in real-world examples. The book offers a number of arguments supporting the variability in the nature and in the range of disagreements, and outlines the main benefits of disagreement among peers i.e. what the author calls the benefits to inquiry argument.
The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement
Author | : J. Matheson |
Publsiher | : Springer |
Total Pages | : 325 |
Release | : 2015-02-10 |
Genre | : Philosophy |
ISBN | : 9781137400901 |
Download The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
Discovering someone disagrees with you is a common occurrence. The question of epistemic significance of disagreement concerns how discovering that another disagrees with you affects the rationality of your beliefs on that topic. This book examines the answers that have been proposed to this question, and presents and defends its own answer.
The Epistemology of Group Disagreement
Author | : Fernando Broncano-Berrocal,J. Adam Carter |
Publsiher | : Routledge |
Total Pages | : 0 |
Release | : 2022-08 |
Genre | : Group decision making |
ISBN | : 0367652641 |
Download The Epistemology of Group Disagreement Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
This book brings together philosophers to investigate the nature and normativity of group disagreement across a range of political, religious, social, and scientific issues.
Disagreement
Author | : Bryan Frances |
Publsiher | : John Wiley & Sons |
Total Pages | : 224 |
Release | : 2014-08-25 |
Genre | : Philosophy |
ISBN | : 9780745685236 |
Download Disagreement Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
Regardless of who you are or how you live your life, you disagree with millions of people on an enormous number of topics from politics, religion and morality to sport, culture and art. Unless you are delusional, you are aware that a great many of the people who disagree with you are just as smart and thoughtful as you are - in fact, you know that often they are smarter and more informed. But believing someone to be cleverer or more knowledgeable about a particular topic usually won’t change your mind. Should it? This book is devoted to exploring this quandary - what should we do when we encounter disagreement, particularly when we believe someone is more of an authority on a subject than we are? The question is of enormous importance, both in the public arena and in our personal lives. Disagreement over marriages, beliefs, friendships and more causes immense personal strife. People with political power disagree about how to spend enormous amounts of money, about what laws to pass, or about wars to fight. If only we were better able to resolve our disagreements, we would probably save millions of lives and prevent millions of others from living in poverty. The first full-length text-book on this philosophical topic, Disagreement provides students with the tools they need to understand the burgeoning academic literature and its (often conflicting) perspectives. Including case studies, sample questions and chapter summaries, this engaging and accessible book is the perfect starting point for students and anyone interested in thinking about the possibilities and problems of this fundamental philosophical debate.
The Epistemology of Group Disagreement
Author | : Fernando Broncano-Berrocal,J. Adam Carter |
Publsiher | : Routledge |
Total Pages | : 281 |
Release | : 2020-12-11 |
Genre | : Philosophy |
ISBN | : 9780429663581 |
Download The Epistemology of Group Disagreement Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
This book brings together philosophers to investigate the nature and normativity of group disagreement. Debates in the epistemology of disagreement mainly have been concerned with idealized cases of peer disagreement between individuals. However, most real-life disagreements are complex and often take place within and between groups. Ascribing views, beliefs, and judgments to groups is a common phenomenon that is well researched in the literature on the ontology and epistemology of groups. The essays in this volume seek to connect these literatures and to explore both intra- and inter- group disagreements. They apply their discussions to a range of political, religious, social, and scientific issues. The Epistemology of Group Disagreement is an important resource for students and scholars working on social and applied epistemology, disagreement, and topics at the intersection of epistemology, ethics, and politics.
Voicing Dissent
Author | : Casey Rebecca Johnson |
Publsiher | : Routledge |
Total Pages | : 325 |
Release | : 2018-02-01 |
Genre | : Philosophy |
ISBN | : 9781351721561 |
Download Voicing Dissent Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
Disagreement is, for better or worse, pervasive in our society. Not only do we form beliefs that differ from those around us, but increasingly we have platforms and opportunities to voice those disagreements and make them public. In light of the public nature of many of our most important disagreements, a key question emerges: How does public disagreement affect what we know? This volume collects original essays from a number of prominent scholars—including Catherine Elgin, Sanford Goldberg, Jennifer Lackey, Michael Patrick Lynch, and Duncan Pritchard, among others—to address this question in its diverse forms. The book is organized by thematic sections, in which individual chapters address the epistemic, ethical, and political dimensions of dissent. The individual contributions address important issues such as the value of disagreement, the nature of conversational disagreement, when dissent is epistemically rational, when one is obligated to voice disagreement or to object, the relation of silence and resistance to dissent, and when political dissent is justified. Voicing Dissent offers a new approach to the study of disagreement that will appeal to social epistemologists and ethicists interested in this growing area of epistemology.
Disagreement Deference and Religious Commitment
Author | : John Pittard |
Publsiher | : Oxford University Press |
Total Pages | : 361 |
Release | : 2019-10-01 |
Genre | : Philosophy |
ISBN | : 9780190051839 |
Download Disagreement Deference and Religious Commitment Book in PDF, Epub and Kindle
The striking extent of religious disagreement suggests that religious conviction is very often the result of processes that do not reliably produce true beliefs. For this reason, many have argued that the only rational response to religious disagreement is to adopt a religious skepticism that eschews confident religious belief. Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment contests this skeptical conclusion, explaining how it could be rational to maintain confident belief even in the face of the epistemic worries posed by disagreement. John Pittard argues against the commitment to rigorous epistemic impartiality that underlies the case for disagreement-motivated religious skepticism, while also critiquing approaches to disagreement that allow for the unproblematic privileging of one's first-person perspective. He emphasizes the importance of having rational insight into reasons that favor one's outlook; however, he challenges narrowly intellectualist accounts of insight, arguing that many of the rational insights crucial to assessing religious outlooks are not achievable through analytical reasoning, but only through relevant emotional experiences. In the second part of the book, Pittard considers the implications that accepting the impartiality requirement favored by "disagreement skeptics" has for religious commitment. He challenges the common assumption that a commitment to rigorous epistemic impartiality would rule out confident religious belief. He further argues, however, that such an impartiality commitment would likely make it irrational to pursue one's favored form of religious life and might prevent one from rationally engaging in any religious or irreligious way of life whatsoever. This troubling conclusion gives reason to hope that the arguments against impartiality are correct and that one can justify conviction despite widespread disagreement.