The Sound Of Meaning Comparative Linguistics Of Ancient Egyptian Maya And Nahuatl

"The African hero of the Trojan War and the keys to ancient world civilization"--P. facing T.p.

Encounter with logos, Japanese, Nahuatl and Egyptian are similar languages." Written and author by Erik De La Torre Stahl(Erik Stahl) Copyrights 1986 Some music we can see in some Mayan's murals where they are using instruments like horns, trumpets and flutes. Similar Writing and meaning between Japanese, Old Egyptian and Nahuatl from Mexico. In the language of Japanese, Old Egyptian and Nahuatl from Mexico are lots of words with the same meaning and the similar writing. Example; Japanese: Tori means bird. Egyptian: Tot means bird Nahuatl: Totol means bird Japanese: Ka means house Egyptian: Ka means house Nahuatl: Ka means house Playing with another languages like German, English & Maya. German: Konig means house English: King means "Who rule the kingdom, better say king Maya: Kin means King The world in Egyptian TUTANKAMON means the bird that lives in Amon Tut or Tot=bird an= in ka= house Amon= Amon The question, why the language of Japanese, Egyptian & Nahuatl are similar. Probably these civilizations were together as one continent before the big flood arrive. In ancients stories they mention the name of Noah in the Bible (o' biblws, that means The Book), a humble man chosen by the God of Abraham. Noah build an arc by the instructions of God for the big flood that will be vanished the world. If we check the name of Noah and we move the letters of Noah a little we have Nahoa Well, I'm playing to much with the names, but think about it. There is a legend in the Nahoas (Old Mexican culture) that says in the book of Bernal Diaz Del Castillo; ....And the Nahoas arrive to the Indian continent through Panico-Panitla Veracruz.. In his ancients stories they survived a big flood that destroyed his old world ..and they called them Atlantes.... Bernal Diaz Del Castillo was a soldier and writer of Hernan Cortez in 1517.. Thanks for Bernal Diaz Del Castillo we have more legends from the Nahoas... There is another amazing legend describe by Bernal Diaz Del Castillo. Papantzin sister of Moctezuma was sick and had a nightmare where white people from the sea will arrived and conquered the Nahoas in Mexico. This dream that had Papantzin was before the Spanish with Hernan Cortez came to Mexico. Well, before the big flood, the continents were together so there were few languages. Probably there was an old language were Japanese, Nahuatl, and Egyptian born. "Encounter With Logos In the beginning the human being tried to have communication each other. There was no language, only sounds and shouts between them. Around them there was nature, sounds of birds and the sea. What was the first word pronounced for the human being. Is a question that sometimes we ask ourselves. By happiness, pain, suffering, crying or laughing, who knows what makes for first time pronounce a word. The music is part of the nature, there is no nature with out music and there is no music with out nature. All the musical instruments are in harmony with the nature. The song of the bird can stop even the lion in battle. Some natives in South Africa speak with a mix of whistles and words. Probably in the beginning the human being started talking with whistles or other sounds. By the time those whistles and sounds made words, those words made drawings. With simple drawings the human started making communication, like the Egyptians, the Nahoas from Mexico and the Orientals. The Egyptians started drawing semiotic Symbols like legs that means walk, or an eye that means watch something. But those symbols were followed with an alphabet. In the new world, or rather say Continent of America, The Mayans created syllabus by drawing faces, parts of the human body. Even they invented the zero, some of the faces means numbers of days.

Towards a Comparative Dictionary of Cikam and Modern African Languages is a collection of vocabulary comparisons from the various works of Asar Imhotep (from 2013-2019) of the ancient Egyptian language with cognates in modern African languages (e.g., ciBantu, Kalenjiin, Sumerian, Yorùbá, and Meroitic). This is a preliminary work whose aim is to set the foundation for an online searchable database of ancient Egyptian vocabulary and its cognates in other Cyena-Ntu (formally Negro-Egyptian) languages. This book begins with an examination of internal comparisons of the ancient Egyptian language (primarily Middle-Egyptian) in an effort to detect dialect varieties and/or other languages spoken in the Nile Valley. From there we examine Egyptian with modern African languages, as well as two ancient languages: i.e., Sumerian and Meroitic. There is little commentary as the focus is only to display and demonstrate the regularity of sound-meaning correspondences between the compared languages. This sets the groundwork for a more detailed analysis of the data (for additions and corrections), in conjunction with other comparative studies, so that future researchers can establish the sound-laws that explain the evolution of forms from the proto-language (Post-Classic Cyena-Ntu) to the modern varieties in the daughter languages.

Edited by two pioneers in the field of sensory archaeology, this Handbook comprises a key point of reference for the ever-expanding field of sensory archaeology: one that surpasses previous books in this field, both in scope and critical intent. This Handbook provides an extensive set of specially commissioned chapters, each of which summarizes and critically reflects on progress made in this dynamic field during the early years of the twenty-first century. The authors identify and discuss the key current concepts and debates of sensory archaeology, providing overviews and commentaries on its methods and its place in interdisciplinary sensual culture studies. Through a set of thematic studies, they explore diverse sensorial practices, contexts and materials, and offer a selection of archaeological case-studies from different parts of the world. In the light of this, the research methods now being brought into the service of sensory archaeology are re-examined. Of interest to scholars, students and others with an interest in archaeology around the world, this book will be invaluable to archaeologists and is also of relevance to scholars working in disciplines contributing to sensory studies: aesthetics, anthropology, architecture, art history, communication studies, history (including history of science), geography, literary and cultural studies, material culture studies, museology, philosophy, psychology, and sociology.

Sample Text