Data Driven Campaigning And Political Parties

Challenging the often-hyperbolic claims that have been made around the use of data in election campaigns for voter manipulation and suppression, this book provides unrivalled evidence of how parties actually behave. It shows that data-driven campaigning practice is not inherently problematic or new, but neither is it uniform, rather systemic, regulatory and party level factors affecting the nature of campaigning. Providing detailed empirical examples from Australia, Canada, Germany, the UK and US, this book shows how parties campaign and explains why parties differ, thereby resetting prevailing understanding of the role of data in campaigns.

In this multidisciplinary book, experts from around the globe examine how data-driven political campaigning works, what challenges it poses for personal privacy and democracy, and how emerging practices should be regulated. The rise of big data analytics in the political process has triggered official investigations in many countries around the world, and become the subject of broad and intense debate. Political parties increasingly rely on data analytics to profile the electorate and to target specific voter groups with individualised messages based on their demographic attributes. Political micro-targeting has become a major factor in modern campaigning, because of its potential to influence opinions, to mobilise supporters and to get out votes. The book explores the legal, philosophical and political dimensions of big data analytics in the electoral process. It demonstrates that the unregulated use of big personal data for political purposes not only infringes voters’ privacy rights, but also has the potential to jeopardise the future of the democratic process, and proposes reforms to address the key regulatory and ethical questions arising from the mining, use and storage of massive amounts of voter data. Providing an interdisciplinary assessment of the use and regulation of big data in the political process, this book will appeal to scholars from law, political science, political philosophy and media studies, policy makers and anyone who cares about democracy in the age of data-driven political campaigning.

This book critiques the use of algorithms to pre-empt personal choices in its profound effect on markets, democracy and the rule of law.

Big data and microtargeting steal the headlines about campaigning. But how important are they really to the way that political parties campaign? This book provides a fine-grained account of the campaign practices of three Australian political parties. It explores how prevalent data-driven campaigning is, introduces an original theoretical framework to understand these practices, and demonstrates that there is a disconnect between what Australian voters think about these issues and the way that parties campaign in the 21st century. Drawing on 161 interviews, participant observation and original survey data, it shows that the reality of contemporary campaigning is often different to what we are led to believe.

Provides academics, journalists, and general readers with bird's-eye view of data-driven practices and their impact in politics and media.

What's wrong with targeted advertising in political campaigns? Should we be worried about echo chambers? How does data collection impact on trust in society? As decision-making becomes increasingly automated, how can decision-makers be held to account? This collection consider potential solutions to these challenges. It brings together original research on the philosophy of big data and democracy from leading international authors, with recent examples - including the 2016 Brexit Referendum, the Leveson Inquiry and the Edward Snowden leaks. And it asks whether an ethical compass is available or even feasible in an ever more digitised and monitored world.

What trends are shaping contemporary political communication and behaviour in Canada, and where are they heading? What’s Trending in Canadian Politics? examines political communication and democratic governance in a digital age. Exploring the effects of conventional and emerging political communication practices in Canada, contributors investigate the uses of digital media for political communication, grassroots-driven protest, public behaviour prediction, and relationships between members of civil society and the political establishment. Original and timely, this interdisciplinary volume lays robust theoretical and methodological foundations for the study of transformative trends in Canadian political communication.

Many think big data transformed politics. Both political observers and scientists have fixated on cutting-edge innovations in campaign data and technology coming from the top of the ticket. Numerous books and articles detail the influx of individual-level voter records compiled into large-scale databases that enabled high-resourced presidential campaigns to microtarget their outreach messages at smaller and smaller segments of the electorate. Existing scholarship assumes that these presidential practices have diffused down the ballot to reshape how lower-level campaigns communicate with voters. Yet no study to date tests these claims. This dissertation expands our understanding of data-driven campaigning by providing the first comprehensive overview of the electoral information environment. This project reveals how new sources of information have not fundamentally altered electoral politics. Even equipped with highly detailed information on voters and advanced statistical models, most campaigns lack the resources to engage in highly personalized outreach efforts and still must address strategic considerations that have long-defined politicking. I argue that the arrival of large voter databases has increased the efficiency of voter outreach activities but exacerbated longstanding tendencies to reduce voters to nothing more than electoral math. Central to my contention that individual records intensify strategic considerations are consistent party-level differences in how campaigns interact with sources of electoral information. This dissertation uncovers how Democrats and Republicans operate in vastly different data environments. Democrats not only share a party-wide voter database but also a mutual data culture that reinforces an approach to campaigning concentrated on leveraging data to maximize the return on investment for their outreach activities. Republicans meanwhile have not coalesced around a single platform or approach to data-driven campaigning. These observed differences lead to a divergence in campaign-level data preferences. Republicans continue to prefer the inferences coming from traditional polls and surveys, while Democrats default to accessing individual-level data on voters. To make these claims, this dissertation combines conversations with campaign professionals with careful analysis of millions of spending records made by thousands of campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives between 2006 and 2018. These conversations help make sense of my findings and ensure my results reflect the realities of contemporary campaigning. I undertake an extensive review and refinement of this substantial number of records to recover campaign-level spending on data and outreach that, until now, have been unavailable to scholars. With these verified spending records, I provide the first thorough examination of electoral information marketplaces and campaign-level spending patterns over a period of marked technological change.