Gold Standard In Theory History

Since the first edition, published in 1985, much new research has been completed. This updated version includes five new essays, including a new introduction by Eichengreen and a discussion of the gold standard and the EU monetary debate.

Since the successful first edition of "The Gold Standard in Theory and History" was published in 1985, much new research has been completed. This updated version contains five new essays including post-1990 literature on exchange rate target zones; a discussion of the light shed by the gold standard on the European Monetary Union debate; and a new introduction by Professor Eichengreen with Marc Flandreau. This will be an invaluable resource for students of macroeconomics, international economics and economic history at all levels.

Since the successful first edition of The Gold Standard in Theory and History was published in 1985, much new research has been completed. This updated version contains five new essays including: * post 1990 literature on exchange rate target zones * a discussion of the light shed by the gold standard on the European Monetary Union debate * a new introduction by Eichengreen with Marc Flandreau This will be an invaluable resource for students of macroeconomics, international economics and economic history at all levels.

Master's Thesis from the year 2013 in the subject Economics - Macro-economics, general, grade: 1,7, Leipzig Graduate School of Management, language: English, abstract: Nach der Finanzkrise 2007/2008 haben die Zentralbanken in den USA und Europa ihre Politik des billigen Geldes verstärkt. Die Geldmengen sind seither drastisch angestiegen und die Gegner des Fiat Money erheben ihre Stimmen immer lauter mit Rufen nach einer Rückkehr zu Goldstandard. Die Arbeit untersucht, ob und wie eine solche Rückkehr möglich ist und welche Konsequenzen daraus resultieren würden. Als Grundlage dieser Untersuchung wird zunächst die Geschichte des Goldstandard betrachtet und analysiert ob dieses Geldsystem tatsächlich so überragend funktioniert hat, wie von seinen Verfechtern versprochen. After the financial crisis of 2007/2008, the central banks in the United States and also in Europe strengthened their policy of cheap money. Due to this policy, the money supply increased rapidly and endangered the low inflation rates the central banks were committed to. The opponents of fiat money raise their voices and urga a return to the gold standard. The thesis main focus is on the question if and how a return to the gold standard would be possible and which consequences would arise. As foundation to this analysis, the gold standard has been analysed in its historical context, regarding the question if it worked so well as its advocates promise.

An eBook in .pdf is available at: newworldeconomics.com. This is the third book on the topic of gold-based monetary systems by Nathan Lewis, following Gold: the Once and Future Money (2007) and Gold: the Monetary Polaris (2013). It builds upon the principles expressed in those first two books, and takes a historical approach to humans' long experience with gold- and silver-based monetary systems.

By the end of the nineteenth century, the world was ready to adopt the gold standard out of concerns of national power, prestige, and anti-English competition. Yet although the gold standard allowed countries to enact a virtual single world currency, the years before World War I were not a time of unfettered liberal economics and one-world, one-market harmony. Outside of Europe, the gold standard became a tool for nationalists and protectionists primarily interested in growing domestic industry and imperial expansion. This overlooked trend, provocatively reassessed in Steven Bryan's well-documented history, contradicts our conception of the gold standard as a British-based system infused with English ideas, interests, and institutions. In countries like Japan and Argentina, where nationalist concerns focused on infant-industry protection and the growth of military power, the gold standard enabled the expansion of trade and the goals of the age: industry and empire. Bryan argues that these countries looked less to Britain and more to North America and the rest of Europe for ideological models. Not only does this history challenge our idealistic notions of the prewar period, but it also reorients our understanding of the history that followed. Policymakers of the 1920s latched onto the idea that global prosperity before World War I was the result of a system dominated by English liberalism. Their attempt to reproduce this triumph helped bring about the global downturn, the Great Depression, and the collapse of the interwar world.