Harvard Law Review Volume 131 Number 3 January 2018

The contents for this January 2018 issue of the Harvard Law Review, Number 3 of Volume 131, include: • Article, "The Endgame of Administrative Law: Governmental Disobedience and the Judicial Contempt Power," by Nicholas R. Parrillo • Book Review, "Rethinking Autocracy at Work," by Cynthia Estlund • Note, "Congressional Intent to Preclude Equitable Relief — Ex Parte Young After Armstrong" • Note, "Sixth Amendment Challenge to Courthouse Dress Codes" • Note, "The Virtues of Heterogeneity, in Court Decisions and the Constitution" In addition, the issue features student commentary on Recent Cases and other legal actions, including such subjects as: standing in class actions for credit reporting; right of access of press re Guantanamo Bay detainees; parolees and disability rights under the ADA; intent and manslaughter by encouraging suicide; proposed legislation to ameliorate punitive effects of drug crimes involving marijuana; and President Trump's tweets purporting to ban transgender servicemembers in the military. Finally, the issue includes summaries of Recent Publications. The Harvard Law Review is offered in a quality digital edition (since 2011), featuring active Contents, linked footnotes, active URLs, legible tables, and proper ebook and Bluebook formatting.

The Harvard Law Review, January 2015, No. 3 of Volume 128, is offered in a digital edition. Contents include: • Article, “Uncovering Coordinated Interagency Adjudication,” by Bijal Shah • Note, “Deference and the Federal Arbitration Act: The NLRB’s Determination of Substantive Statutory Rights” • Note, “Education Policy Litigation as Devolution” • Note, “Physically Intrusive Abortion Restrictions as Fourth Amendment Searches and Seizures” • Note, “Copyright Reform and the Takings Clause” In addition, the issue features student commentary on Recent Cases and policy resolutions, including such subjects as constitutional protection for teacher tenure, suspicionless street stop of suspect’s companion, warrants to search foreign emails, confrontation clause in sentence selection phase of capital case, subject matter jurisdiction of tribal courts, physician inquiries into gun ownership and freedom of speech, reviewability of FDA inaction on pet drug products, and veto of a UN Security Council resolution on Syrian conflict. Finally, the issue features several summaries of Recent Publications. The Harvard Law Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. The Review comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2500 pages per volume. The organization is formally independent of the Harvard Law School. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions. This issue of the Review is January 2015, the third issue of academic year 2014-2015 (Volume 128). The digital edition features active Contents, linked notes, and proper ebook and Bluebook formatting.

The Harvard Law Review is offered in a digital edition, featuring active Contents, linked notes, and proper ebook formatting. The contents of Issue 3, January 2013, include: • Article, “Politicians as Fiduciaries,” by D. Theodore Rave • Book Review, “Is Copyright Reform Possible?” by Pamela Samuelson • Note, “The SEC Is Not an Independent Agency” In addition, student research explores Recent Cases on the Fourth Amendment implications of “pinging” a GPS signal on a cellphone, the First Amendment and mandatory tobacco graphic warnings, the First Amendment and police impersonation statutes, whether software method claims are patent ineligible, and other research.