Honor Obey

David Belvedere is a hard partying, fun loving guy with a big trust fund and a nasty habit of getting into trouble. Adam Wentworth is just the billionaire to tame him...

An account of the transformation of cultural assumptions affecting parental authority and children's freedom to choose marriage partners, this book traces colonial period changes in ideas about free will, love, and honor, and in the views of the Catholic church.

There are two sides to every story. ~Book 3 of the Honor Series~ Emma has found the love of her life, but his dark secrets could change everything. With a horrible accident and the loss of another loved one, the student must become the teacher. As secrets begin to unravel, will she be able to look passed them or will she have to leave William and start life new again? **256 pages**

When we hear the voice of God what is our reaction? Do we doubt what He says? Do we answer with our own questioning? Or do we jump right in and just do it? This book hopes to give encouragement to “obey, obey now, obey willingly”. Reading this book will give insight on hearing and listening to God. It will show by obedience to God we will bring delight to Him and we will see the results of God’s radical love for us.

Examination of the murder trial of Luann Fratt and how Michael Dowd her lawyer defended her.

The central question in political philosophy is whether political states have the right to coerce their constituents and whether citizens have a moral duty to obey the commands of their state. In this 2005 book, Christopher Heath Wellman and A. John Simmons defend opposing answers to this question. Wellman bases his argument on samaritan obligations to perform easy rescues, arguing that each of us has a moral duty to obey the law as his or her fair share of the communal samaritan chore of rescuing our compatriots from the perils of the state of nature. Simmons counters that this, and all other attempts to explain our duty to obey the law, fail. He defends a position of philosophical anarchism, the view that no existing state is legitimate and that there is no strong moral presumption in favor of obedience to, or compliance with, any existing state.