Rhetorical Analysis Lloyd F Bitzer S The Rhetorical Situation

Essay from the year 2010 in the subject Rhetoric / Elocution / Oratory, grade: Undergraduate 300 Level, The University of North Carolina at Wilmington, course: Rhetorical Theory Since 1900, language: English, abstract: In his 1969 academic thesis entitled The Rhetorical Situation, Professor Lloyd F. Bitzer examines the role that context plays in crafting effective discourse. This essay is an analysis of that thesis. Bitzer states that the rhetorical situation determines which rhetorical devices to use, the type of diction that is appropriate and the complexity of the discourse. He discusses the relationship between language and argument; language plays a primitive role, one that links human activity to the message. The essay ends by differentiating between rhetoric and the craft of persuasion.

Winner, Speech Communication Association Award for Distinguished Scholarship This is a book that, almost singlehandedly, freed scholars from the narrow constraints of a single critical paradigm and created a new era in the study of public discourse. Its original publication in 1965 created a spirited controversy. Here Edwin Black examines the assumptions and principles underlying neo-Aristotelian theory and suggests an alternative approach to criticism, centering around the concept of the "rhetorical transaction." This new edition, containing Black's new introduction, will enable students and scholars to secure a copy of one of the most influential books ever written in the field.

With the advent of new media and technology, the notion of the rhetorical situation has changed, and there is now the exigence of a new theory of the rhetorical situation that better incorporates such new notions. By bringing together critical theory of technology and theory of critical geography, along with rhetoric and language theory, this book proposes a new theory on the rhetorical situation that has more explanatory power, and accounts for, frames, critiques, and analyses the fundamental assumptions and beliefs on the rhetorical situation. This theory conceives the constituents of the rhetorical situations as indiscrete and non-linear entities. The book offers an innovative way to study the rhetorical situation in a new light that will broaden the research scope of rhetoric.

By examining ways of conceptualizing and exploring rhetorical experience, this book contributes to a better understanding of the nature and uses of rhetorical communication. Since World War II traditional concepts of rhetoric have been undermined, producing a crisis of identity. Instead of the comfortable assumptions formerly shared by Aristotle, John Quincy Adams, Woodrow Wilson, and most academicians, many of today's humanists and some social scientists have become confused concerning the meaning, substance, and scope of rhetoric even concerning the distinction between the rhetorical and nonrhetorical. Partly under the impact of logical positivism, some critics have dismissed persuasive discourse as mere rhetoric"--an anomaly in the age of such rhetoricians as Churchill, Roosevelt, de Gaulle, and Martin Luther King. Others have deprecated spoken discourse in favor of written composition, despite the enthusiasm for speechmaking of Yeats and other literary giants--an anomaly in the age of broadcasting. Five of the ten chapters in this contributed book address the nature of the phenomenon we call rhetoric, and five concern the useful or valuable application of theory to the practical employment of rhetoric (in politics and public affairs, in social and natural science, in religious and ethical teachings, in ceremony, and in literature). The contributors, among the most distinguished of the nation's rhetoricians, are James R. Andrews, Carroll C. Arnold, Lloyd F. Bitzer, Edwin Black, Douglas Ehninger, Henry W. Johnstone, Jr., Lawrence W. Rosenfield, Robert L. Scott, Herbert W. Simons, and Eugene E. White. One way to sum up the book's message would be: even if rhetoric never regains the exalted place it held in the medieval trivium, it deserves far more serious attention than many moderns give it. The position in today's curriculum eventually assumed by rhetoric will be determined basically by the identity it chooses, the credibility of the theoretical concepts claimed as rhetorical, and the useful application of such theory to the practical concerns of society.

John Robert Barker uses rhetorical criticism of Haggai to tease out the probable attitudes and anxieties among the Yehudite community that saw rebuilding as both undesirable and unfeasible. While some in the community accepted the prophet‘s claim that YHWH wanted the temple built, others feared that adverse agricultural and economic conditions, as well as the lack of a royal builder, were clear signs that YHWH did not approve or authorize the effort. Haggai‘s counterarguments are combined with his vilification of opponents as unclean and non-Israelite.

Covering a broad range of rhetorical perspectives, Rhetorical Criticism: Perspectives in Action, third edition presents a well-grounded introduction to the basics of rhetorical criticism and theory in an accessible manner for advanced undergraduate courses and introductory graduate courses. Throughout the text, sample essays written by noted experts in the field provide students with models for writing their own criticisms. In addition to covering traditional modes of rhetorical criticism, the book introduces less commonly discussed rhetorical perspectives as well as orientations toward performing criticisms including close-textual analysis, critical approaches, and analysis of visual and digital rhetoric. The third edition includes the following features: New chapters on visual rhetoric and digital rhetoric Potentials and Pitfalls sections analyzing individual perspectives Activities and discussion questions in each chapter Glossary of important terms

First Published in 1996. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.